Our First Mexican President

El Presidente Jorge Walker Boosh: "Okay, folks, let's try this in (heh-heh) English. Look, I know what you're feeling. You feel the good old USA is being invaded and occupied by a country with a government so rotten, so corrupt and so half-assed that it must dump its own people on us illegally.......... Hey,  the elite feel your pain. They're not all globoloco (heh-heh) And they're not really like the Latin elite who know that a country is easier to manage  and  run over when it's nice and brown, and if the agitators get them jumping in the streets too much,  the military mows 'em down if necessary. We're not like that, and they know it..........  So listen up, folks: we can't deport 11, 15, 20 million, including 1 million of their criminals. Round 'em up?  Impossible........... You say cut off the welfare their own  won't give them? Stop our liberal entitlements, the food stamps, the driver licenses, the free tuition their own won't give them, the counterfeit social security cards? Stop them from bankrupting our hospitals? You mean let them deport themselves back to their venal godawful Government?.......... But  folks, where's the compassion? My brother Jeb's wife Columba (a fine Mexi lady) says this is hurtful. Not good for our gringo image. You want these illegals and their professional agitators calling you racists and taking over our streets and daring  us to fire on 'em for CNN and Al-Jazeera? (By the way, Jeb's wife doubts that many Al Quaeda terrorists or nuke mules  are studying Spanish. I like her optimism, heh-heh).......... Folks, you know how I feel about vigilantes and Minutemen. We don't want outlaws calling this a national emergency..........You say stop the baby citizen racket that no other country in the world permits, not even the silly Canadian socialists? Yes, but how welcoming is that to immigrants?  Columba can tell you how hurtful it is.......... Look, this is not about you being tax-paying suckers.  Look at Business.  Business needs people who will work, not just hang out. Work cheap. And if we truly enforced the law, what  would our socialist enemies say, even after our friend Senator Kennedy did so much to quash legal European immigration so he could  keep the USA from being too white? Remember, if you want the country more white, you're a racist. If you want it more brown, you're not a racist.  Ask our friendly talking heads in the...uh, corporate media. Heh-heh......... Besides, ACLU lawyers won't let you stop  paying welfare for millions of illegals They'll sue to get your taxes for their agenda.   La Raza would get angry too and whip out their race card............ Folks, let's face it: Business wants cheap labor, politicians want cheap votes, some people work and some don't. Some of ours don't..........And these illegals like dignity. They don't want us calling them illegal, just because they're violating our laws. Sure, they'd clap you in jail for acting like this in their country. But we're not like that.  We have, uh, different behavior patterns........Remember, Mexico is a very proud nation, even if its government is a  piece-of-crap narco-republica.  You know how they get when Mexico has a soccer match.  They got macho comin' out their nachos (heh-heh.).........Our Mexi friends have an expression: chingada. It's not that they or their communist agitators take us for suckers who got fat.  They're just tired of being chingada.. They've been chingada for centuries. Yes, maybe we are now in danger of becoming chingada ourselves........... So what's the answer? Well, it's simple, really. Why complicate it? All we have to do is import Mexico's problems, save its no-good dirt-bag government, put their people to work, then  give them citizenship so they won't work so cheap. That's what they want,what Business wants, and the politicians want. You can't have their bloody  criminals tearing up our cities, can you? I sure don't want that........... And don't worry, folks, this won't be amnesty or surrender. We'll put them in the back of the line, no more forgeries, no more gaming the gringos. Do you think we'll be the first in all human history to surrender a nation without a shot? Look around you.  Do we look like fools and fattened-up dingbats? Is this some kind of New World Ordure?(heh-heh.).......... Folks,  even when this new batch of 11-15-20 million brings the rest of the family, I guarantee they will not out-breed or out-number us---not  during my administration...........   And that's not all, folks.  You know what else? We're gonna sing the National Anthem in English. You have my word........... The business and politician elites are not driving you into the state-funded dream of our enemies, a dangerous,Balkanized America with bad plumbing.  We know our forefathers did not fight and struggle to bequeath us a thousand points of blight.  And I repeat, this is not a national emergency ...........You can count on it, amigos....

BlogWorld: June 01 update:  For further examples of Bush/Washington complicity in the anarchy of illegals, and how they(and Dems) will cripple enforcement, see Michelle Malkin's  "Now He Says Something?"   May 24 Update:  Michelle Malkin reports  Ed Meese (Ronald Reagan's Atty. Gen.) insight on the border anarchy, Meese: It Is Amnesty.... May 15 Update: Conservative tigress La Shawn Barber (who'll be live-blogging El Presidente's speech tonight)  tells why she'll never register Republican and will do something very radical--tell the truth whether it offends Left or Right. On Multiculturalism. ....Firebrand Michelle Malkin fires away at Bush's "dog and pony charade" in "Too Little, Too Late.".....May 01.Firebrand Michelle Malkin is up at 'em again with report on another example of how U.S. law men will not enforce the law,'Attorneys Generals vs. Law Enforcement.'....May 11 Update: The indefatigable Michelle Malkin's The Border Patrol Under Seige, with fotos.... May 10 Update. Is Mexico now controlling our border at the highest levels of U.S. Government? See Michelle's Homeland Insecurity Bulletin....Cause for alarm in White House, joy in MondoLefty? See conservative LaShawn Barber's Should George Bush Be Impeached?....May 02 Update. Outside the Beltway has a round-up of yesterday's big demonstrations (on world-wide socialist-communist holiday) that advocate violation of U.S. laws, Day Without Immigrants ...Michelle Malkin reveals how the guevaranomic communists are using these illegal illiterates in The Pictures You Won't See.... Professional newsman Joe Gandelman at The Moderate Voice asks solid questions about the pro-illegal demonstrations: Success or Provocation? ....Mark in Mexico reports on what he saw in Oaxaca with his own gringo eyes in Boycott The Gringos?....Again from Michelle, more graphic photos inspired by Communista/Reconquista:  Borders? What Borders?...Protein Wisdom links to a video of the massive outlaw rallies in L.A., One Day in May...May 03 Update. LaShawn Barber looks at "the tug of war for America's soul" in the dramatic reversal by voters in Herndon, VA....Latino Issues is also looking at the Herndon, VA "backlash."....On the reconquista racial ferment, Michelle Malkin reports on a chicana leader with a law degree who refers to white people as "wetbacks."....At Allthingsbeautiful Alexandra (you may join me in wishing her a happy birthday) reports on move in Washington to gut "felony" for illegal aliens,The Spineless Nancy Pelosi....May 04 Update: Captain Ed looks at how Immigration Activists Lose African-Americans, and Paul Butler at blackprof.com examines this too....May 06 Update. Michelle has a report on how, for El Cinco de Mayo, the Texas Rangers'  uniforms said "Los Rangers." El Presidente Boosh, formerly a part owner, should be proud. June 16 Update: From Michelle Malkin, Bush Snubs Border Officials.

 

© gringoworks, 2006

Technorati Tags: reconquista, immigration, Bush, May Day, Mexico

Comments

[gringoman]

(The following is being re-posted. It's from Sgt. Trevor in Baghdad at www.willtoexist.com and may or not be on the same wave length as "Our First Mexican Presisdent."......)

Message to all illegal immigrants
Filed by Trevor under Current Events, United States (Monday May 1, 2006 at 10:25 am)

There are two ways to immigrate to the United States, legally and illegally. They are very different.

As a legal immigrant and naturalized citizen who submitted myself to the tedious, irritating and somewhat dehumanizing process of having the federal government approve my application for citizenship I would say this: if you are here illegally, instead of wasting time rallying in parks and demanding benefits you haven’t earned, start working on switching your status from illegal to legal. This will assure you many opportunities you will not otherwise have. One method of ensuring your eventual citizenship, if that is what you want, is to join the military and serve honorably. I know because I chose that path. If you aren’t here with the goal of legally becoming a citizen, then please go home.

This country isn’t about free rides, or it shouldn’t be. Learn English. Work on your education. Get your paperwork in order. Then you can protest and demand things. Until then, shut up. The American dream is reserved for people who try to live within the framework of the law.

To be fair, there are a lot of bad laws on the books. Perhaps you have found yourself inconvenienced by some of those. If so, then perhaps when you are done learning English and going through the naturalization process, you will find yourself motivated to become a lawyer. Maybe you will dedicate your life to government service and try to change things for the better. Until then, I’m tired of your whining. You are here illegally and therefore, you are not entitled to the same consideration that legal immigrants receive. If you cannot understand this, you do not belong here in any case.

Please consider moving to Waziristan where the idea of Rule of Law is not an important one. I’m sure they will welcome you.

[gringoman]

Note: The following was posted by gringoman at Alexandra's unique Allthingsbeautiful.com in response to her post "The Spineless Nancy Pelosi." At this time gringovision feels inspired to re-post it here....

Alexandra,

If The Pelosi is spineless (and far be it from me to dispute that), one wonders what is the proper adjective for El Presidente Boosh in "Our first Mexican President," as quoted by the following extract from his speech presented at gringoman.

".... So listen up, folks: we can't deport 11, 15, 20 million, including 1 million of their criminals. Round 'em up? Impossible........... You say cut off the welfare their own won't give them? Stop our liberal entitlements, the food stamps, the driver licenses, the free tuition their own won't give them, the counterfeit social security cards? Stop them from bankrupting our hospitals? You mean let them deport themselves back to their venal godawful Government?.......... But folks, where's the compassion? My brother Jeb's wife Columba (a fine Mexi lady) says this is hurtful. Not good for our gringo image. You want these illegals and their professional agitators calling you racists and taking over our streets and daring us to fire on 'em for CNN and Al-Jazeera? (By the way, Jeb's wife doubts that many Al Quaeda terrorists or nuke mules are studying Spanish. I like her optimism, heh-heh).......... Folks, you know how I feel about vigilantes and Minutemen. We don't want outlaws calling this a national emergency........"

Okay, now for the best part of this comment: Happy birthday, Alexandra, and many more to come!

Posted by: gringoman | Wednesday, May 03, 2006 at 03:22 PM

[scott edwards]

After reading this screed one cannot help but admire the duplicity.
I cannot fathom wether the Gringoman is more angry at the Bush administration, the left, or those who participated in the historic marches.

One thing is certain: If the undocumented had any right-wing proclivities whatsoever, or could feign persecution Fantova-style that a firing squad would be a repatriots just desserts, then the rightwing would find the expediency to allow entry no matter the numbers.
Busheviks carve an exception for those from Cuba, sans papiers, who might touch 'dry sand'; and no matter there is no quota.
One might have counted the Salvadoran-Americans on one hand prior to Reagans "moral equivilant to the founding fathers" screed, and now there are more than 250,000 in Los Angeles alone.

Not addressed in the Bush speech are those across the the american population that daily benifit from the exploitation of undocumented immigrants. Explotation meaning the disparity between the cost of hiring a citizen versus an illegal. Here despite federal legislation in 1986 requiring prospective employees to document their eligibility to work, employes ignored the law while the INS did not enforce the law.

Finally, it is ironic that the fascist right in the USA rests its ideo head on the concept of states rights and comity between the states and the federal government. States wishing to grant those domiciled with its borders rights in excess those dictated by federal mandate are chastised by fascists from other states. Under the american system a person is both a citizen of the republic and a citizen in the state where domiciled.
If one state wishes to grant entitlements to non-citizens it is not the business of those who are domiclied in another state.
(This concept will be especially hard to digest by the wingnuts and I suggest that the Gringoman discuss 'comity' and the 'federal/state citizenship' in greater detail to the unwashed)

Here is a method in helping to divine ones own propinquity from the american political mainstrean. Simply answer:

Do you support the rounding up and mass deportation of some 15 millions of persons? If so, would you find a spot on the wall for those who hired them?

[gringoman]

Professor Eduardos:

Did you and the kookistas have an enjoyable Marxie May Day, encouraging the ignorant illegals to flout the laws of the nation in which they now demand illegal rights? And I see you are now asking yes or no questions. Does this mean you and your faux Canadian protege are ready to answer likewise, on questions you've been dodging for months now, as for example.
(1) Do you support or not the Anti-Islamic Manifesto posted here March 01?

(2) Do you and your protege advocate (or otherwise support) the right of Roberto to marry Federico?

Kindly reply at your earliest convenience. It would help to persuade gringoVision that you were (1) serious about the question you asked and (2) you feel ready to climb to new heights of integrity, principle, honesty and even forthrightness..

[scott edwards]

"Enjoyable Marxie May Day"?? Why, yes, I always enjoy the holidays. (Gringoman should point out to the biblio-challenged the US origins of May Day and its subsequent cold war replacement, Labor Day.)

But dear Gringoman, you dress me in borrowed robes for how can I "encourage" persons marching in the streets to enter your country illegally? It is a fait accompli.

One can plainly see that when it comes to my arguments above that Gringoman has simply fled the field. You havn't addressed those who benefit from the exploitation of these people.

The weakness of the case propounded by the american far right is their reluctance to comprehend that whoring requires a john. The onus is on the employers to maintain records (via the federal I-9) of their employees right to work. Employers by the thousands put their own pecuiniary interests ahead of their duty to obey the law. The duplicity of the fascist house bill that criminalizes the immigrant does not address the employer who induced the criminal behavior by ignoring the requirement to demonstrate that the prospective employee has legal status.
So whilst on your Pilgramage to Predappio by seeking the mass deportation of those offering their labor don't forget the concentration camps for your fellow republicans who hired them.
Then come whine to me here about justice.

My friends and I arrived in Tijuana late Sunday morning. Some did not have visa for entry into the USA. We considered hiring a mule to enter into San Diego, or alternativly use a tunnel (dug by your Oregon potheads to smuggle marijuana into Mexico) but instead we attended a solidarity rally in TJ. Sorry you could not join us. I'll be back at La Fonda in late June.

My Uncle Karl forwarded me in Santiago this article about the exploitation of mexicans which offers a different prospective from the Dobbsian-Foxiholics I've been reading on wingnut blogs:

http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/vogel010506.html

Finally, these boycott america tags have been popping up all over the chilean press (but given how america has fucked us one should understand)Scroll down and look left:

http://www.chileradio.cl/

[gringoman]

Professor, you've set yourself up for a real fisking (if you'll pardon the reference to your UK journo hero who knows which side is safer to condemn in the Middle East.)

"Enjoyable Marxie May Day"?? Why, yes, I always enjoy the holidays. (Gringoman should point out to the biblio-challenged the US origins of May Day and its subsequent cold war replacement, Labor Day.)(Gringoman can point out the origins of May Day going back millenia. Will the Professor point out the "People's Parasites" like ANSWER, who used the brown masses as a way to come back from the living dead?)

But dear Gringoman, you dress me in borrowed robes for how can I "encourage" persons marching in the streets to enter your country illegally? It is a fait accompli.(I thought the Professor understood his own profession well enough to know that there are other ways to encourage the illegals to game the gringos.Illegal entry is just the beginning. Did I overestimate you?)

One can plainly see that when it comes to my arguments above that Gringoman has simply fled the field. You havn't addressed those who benefit from the exploitation of these people.(What's plainly to be seen is that you are either (1) not competent to read El Presidente's speech above, where he very plainly refers to benefits for "business" or (2) the gingko biloba for memory isn't working?)

The weakness of the case propounded by the american far right is their reluctance to comprehend that whoring requires a john. The onus is on the employers to maintain records (via the federal I-9) of their employees right to work. Employers by the thousands put their own pecuiniary interests ahead of their duty to obey the law. The duplicity of the fascist house bill that criminalizes the immigrant does not address the employer who induced the criminal behavior by ignoring the requirement to demonstrate that the prospective employee has legal status.
So whilst on your Pilgramage to Predappio by seeking the mass deportation of those offering their labor don't forget the concentration camps for your fellow republicans who hired them.
Then come whine to me here about justice.(If the Professor, while shilling for the pale comrades, the castrophiliacs and the Rekookistas, can find a single instance of gringoVision insisting on leniency or non-punishment for criminals of the Left or the Right, let him produce it, as a bonafidies of whatever integrity he is aspiring to these days.)

My friends and I arrived in Tijuana late Sunday morning. Some did not have visa for entry into the USA. We considered hiring a mule to enter into San Diego, or alternativly use a tunnel (dug by your Oregon potheads to smuggle marijuana into Mexico) but instead we attended a solidarity rally in TJ. Sorry you could not join us. I'll be back at La Fonda in late June.(This may be what you get for depending more on Cana-kooks than the competent coyotes of the rotten narco-republica you prefer not to mention.)

My Uncle Karl forwarded me in Santiago this article about the exploitation of mexicans which offers a different prospective from the Dobbsian-Foxiholics I've been reading on wingnut blogs: (If it's as bad as your Uncle Karl Marxola suggests, (1)what does this say about the Latin society and Government these illegals left and (2) what does it say about the latin elitist "intellectual's" need to deflect his own society's realities by focusing, like a good sophomoric guevaramaniac, on the "Yankee imperialistas"?

And by the way, why is the Professor Eduardos suddenly tongue-tied when asked whether he supports, legally,the "human right" of Roberto to marry Jose? Somehow we expect more from the outspoken "revolutionary" anti-American Latin intellect. (Don't ask me why.)

[Phillip Wedeen]

Gringoman, is it hydrophobia?
What is 'fisking' and the middle-east correspondant have to do with the Republican Party exploitation of undocumented workers?

Then you, Gringoman, just repeat Mr Edwards cogent analysis a second time.

Then you want to know about homosexual marriage?!

I gather you are angry but anger is no excuse for failing to proffer a reasoned response. This is how some on the right earn the appellation, "wingnut"; that is, they go way off topic instead of offering a reaonable rebuttal. In this case Gringoman is sputtering "lefty labels" and asking about gay marriage while the topic du jour is the immigrants march.
Tant pis pauvre Gringoman, you somehow forgot to include George Soros and Oil-4-Food which are important to the debate here, somehow.

Why not take a breath and start anew? I-m-m-i-g-r-a-t-i-o-n.

[gringoman]

Wedeen,

I used to think you had a certain natural advantage over your marxie master, at least with respect to English comprehension. Now, after my previous post addressed 'i-m-m-i-g-r-a-t-i-o-n' in a half dozen ways,both directly and indirectly (and you even spelled it correctly) you claim, like a grade school dufus, not to see it, and you compound your dufusness by hiding behind lame generalizing and not specifying a single item from the nerudista charge sheet. Wait, you get even more dufus. You fail even to see that the question about homo marriage--like the one about Islamos-- was introduced to demonstrate how your mentor, like you,are so slithery you expect someone to answer straightforward questions while you have the privilege not to do the same yourselves. You even think this self-granted privilege lets you escape the weasel trap you fell into yet again.

Is this your way of making Eduardos proud of his Cana-kook connection?

[shingles]

Escaping Politically Correct...

You are escaping an adjective?

[Phillip Wedeen]

The texas baseball team embroiders "Los Rangers" on the uniform and the fascists blogosphere go ga-ga and foam at the mouth.
One can expect a future anglofication campaign exponging names like "Los Angeles", "San Antonio", and "Santa Fe" in an effort to deny reality.
Wingnuts!
Gringoman, wipe that foam from around your mouth.
I could be wrong but I don't think there will be any scheduled flights from Montreal to Bushingrad or St. Frances anytime soon.

Maybe "Nueva York". Which whizz wang illegal anglo-wingnut had it changed from 'New Amsterdam' to 'New York'? Turnabout is fair play. I like "Nueva Madrid" because it ratains the cosmopolitan feel while imbueing the cultural sense of 'patria' or 'fatherland'.

Your team Gringoman can be Los Wingnuts or just Wingnuts, it really doesn't matter.

Finally those mexican resturants can be simply referred to as resturants while that anglo fast-food can be referred to as 'el junk'.

[gringoman]

From Shingles------

Escaping Politically Correct...

You are escaping an adjective?

Reply: Yes, especially when ProgWorld's post-Stalinist Thought Police have turned it into an adjectival noun.

[gringoman]

[Re-posted from Comments to Allthingsbeautiful.com post, 'Restoring Humility to Our National Psyche in the Face of Nihilism.']

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The "humility" of Bush? All right.

The imperious (if not imperialist) boldness of Bush, willing to risk much to gain much for world stability? All right.

Even the mistakes in Iraq war management (whether inevitable or not) have not made the rear-view critic-weasels more attractive? Granted.

He's got a "vision thing" despite shortcomings in the ability to voice and articulate it? All right.

But does he have too much "globo-vision" to understand what America Without Borders will really mean, especially as more and more of his constituency come to see him as "Our First Mexican President"?

In brief, what profiteth it a man and his people, even should he win a war, and understandeth The Long War, and yet lose a Nation?

[gringoman]

Cause for White House alarm? The "I" word, long a lefty moonbat favorite, is now being discussed---not necessarily advocated, yet---but discussed even at conservative LaShawn Barber. Here is a keen contribution from Commenter Erik..............

Other posters have framed the issue as Bush refusing to do anything, Bush being lax on border security, etc. If that is merely the case, no, he should not be impeached, as his laxness does not rise to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.

However, yesterday’s revelation that U.S Border Patrol (under the umbrella of the DHS, which was created on Bush’s watch) is tipping off the Mexican government as to the whereabouts of the Minutemen raises the issue to another, more serious level.

If Bush ordered this, then he has affirmatively attempted to undermine U.S. border security, and that IMO would most definitely be an impeachable offense. And given Bush’s past statements about the Minutemen, the speculation is not unreasonable.

If Bush didn’t order the Mexican government tipped off but knew about it, it still might rise to that level, as it certainly falls under what another poster refers to a malign neglect. It would also be, as LaShawn suggested, a clear violation of his oath of office. (Emphasis added)

[Phillip Wedeen]

So as you yanks would say, 'Strike three, you're out!'.
The sweet smell of Republican party success.
Neo-Conservatism and the Project for a New American Century is a scourge on the planet, best seen in the rear-view window.

And, as a practical matter, for the neo-tory cum francoistas, Von Maltzan and Cameron-Rodill, crossing the border at Santa Barbara into Mexico is far more befitting their nobility than the taudry aux-pieds of Tijuana.

Relax gringoman. I'm sure the gordos in Mexico City will allow you at least one english speaking radio station; and anyway, guys of your towering intellect don't waste time with television.
In the hermit kingdom of bloggers, where all things are beautiful, the young iraqi dentists prefer (3to1) mexican tele-novellas over the pablum of american drek (you said it yourself) on tv.

So if el-yanqui-fascistas have "lost the nation"; seen from the view of the rest of the planet and the majority of yankdwellers too, this is a good thing!

[scott edwards]

Crazed Malkin Reader #1: Gringoman.

Your public awaits.

http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/002703.html

[gringoman]

Wedeen,

Here's a chance for you to take a deep breath, try to decompress, even attempt a bit of de-kookification, and expose your Marxinutted (sic) brain cells to the clear breeze of sense, intellect and integrity. The following is a re-post from Comments at Captain's Quarters re the upcoming "Immigration reform" legislation in the U.S. Congress. (Read as slowly as necessary. Surely Eduardos will assist, if you ask him for help with reading comprehension--assuming he's done the work I previously reccommended for him. By the way, have you thanked Captain Ed for his yeoman blogging, previously, in exposing the stinking corruption in Canada's government, or is gratitude, acknowledging the debt to Americans forbidden for the "anti-fascist" Homo Prog?)........

===========================

This is utter nonsense we have had numerous, so
called "immigration reforms." and all they have done is make things worse. We have had dozens upon dozens of small and large reforms and all it has done is to allow more and more illegal immigration. http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/legishist/index.htm

In 65' we amnestied 2 million with the promise that we were going to crackdown, no such thing happened the problem only got worse. In 86' we amnestied 5 million with the promise that we would get serious about illegal immigration, no such thing occurred. In 96' we had another round of immigration reform, we normalized a few million more, with you guessed it, a promise that we were going to honest injun, crack down. And here we are in 06' talking about normalizing between 11-20 million illegals, does anyone see a pattern here. Every so called reform only makes the problem worse every ten years or so. Also to those who are in favor of a guest worker program, you should have to answer the following questions.

1) What agency or agencies will be administering the guest worker program?
I assume it will be INS but INS is currently doing a horrific job enforcing
current laws and regulations. So it will need an enormous infusion of
funds or the creation of a new bureaucracy.

2) Is the guest worker program open for illegals already in country or for
new wokers not currently in country? Is this guest worker plan open to
every country in the world or is this strictly limited to south american
labor?

3) How will illegal immigrants take part in the guest worker program?
Will they be able to apply in-country or will they have to go to their
home country and apply?

4) Who will be able to apply, single men, men and woman, married
couples with children? What happens if the guest worker gets
pregnant and has a child or a guest worker fathers a child in-country?

5) What industries will be able to use guest workers?

6) How will employers place orders for guest workers?

7) I have heard proposals for up-to 1.5 million guest workers, once the
number has been set, will it be hard or soft cap?

8) What sort of non-forgeable documentation will be given to the guest worker?
Will the documentation list their country of origin, place of residence, and guest
worker occupation?
If a guest worker is fired or his job eliminated, will he have to leave the country
or will he be able to pursue a new guest worker occupation?

9) How will we keep track of the guest workers and make sure employers use
authorized guest workers only?

10) How long will a guest worker be allowed to participate in the program
before he must return to his home country?

11) Will they be allowed to pursue permanent status in-country or will they
have to return to their home country and apply?

12) What sort of boarder enforcement will be implemented?
We can’t have a guest worker program and still have hundreds
of thousands of illegals streaming across the boarder.

Please feel free to add to the question list.

We are at a tipping point in our society. Our sovreignty is being challenged by a third world country. The Mexican government is for all-intents-and-purposes controlling our immigration policy. When I hear these politicians they seem to be more concerned with the rights of the illegals than the rights and wishes of the American people, and it disgusts me.
Posted by: Michael Branca [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 12, 2006 07:01 AM

[gringoman]

Note from gringoVision: The Carpetbagger Report is a lefty blog. There were plenty of comments recently about "racist" FoxNews. Some were actually half-way rational, if you call "rational" the "sensitive new-age" caucasoid who wants to apologize for his existence . Others were more like what you'd expect from the epithet bag of an Ottawa "progressive" like Wedeen. One, however, was so different from the pack, we have to re-post it here.

===========================

#

1. Mexicans are disproportionate consumers of state-funded services such as Medicaid, welfare, education, 'special education,' police, criminal courts, prisons…

2. Mexicans are poor economic producers. They were poor producers in 'Mexico' and remain poor producers. They didn't leave Mexico. They brought it with them. "Ah Mexico, Mexico, she is a lifelong love affair. Where ever I am, there she is also!" Thus goes the life of the Mexican Indian. 'Mexico' is not a state of mind and it is not a 'culture.' Mexico is a genetic pool.

Comment by zogusa — 5/12/2006 @ 9:43 pm

[scott edwards]

Gringoman:
Are you a white supremecist?
Why are you posting nazi screed like "zogusa"?

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:sgnhpyXigLwJ:www.faem.com/adlib/2000/a0622.htm+zogusa&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1&ie=UTF-8

Say it was a mistake!

Are you telling us that there is more to being american than mere citizenship?

[gringoman]

Eduardos de los Izquierdos:

You can take a break from your typical racist latino attempt to play the dog-eared race card against norteamericanos (especially the blancos--as you would know all about the "anti-racist" blancos, like your Fidel, who rule most of Latin America) I describe myself---if you're hard up for labels---as a 'Western Civilizationist.' What do you label yourself as? In fact, since I might be a bit "prejudiced" about the incompetent governance of Latin America, why don't you clarify the matter? Why don't you explain how it is not really the unctuous and "revolution"-spouting blancos and mestizos--whether they are killers named Che, Castro or "business" types like Vicente Fox-- who rule the blacks and browns of Latin America---under cover of choice "anti-imperialist" rhetoric and euphemisms?

[Phillip Wedeen]

The only egg on anyones face is GRINGOMANs!! Why is the Gringoman importing white supremecist screed in the comments section?

Look at ZOGUSA's comments!
"..Mexico is a gene pool"!
In other words, mexicans are genetically inferior.

This brings a whole new demension into the debate. How many other Republican bedbugs agree?
Well Gringoman, at least ZOGUSA has the huevos to put his racism out there for the world to see while other cockroaches hide behind the imported words of others!

[Debbie]

Hey, nice post and great art work. Don't you have an RSS or some other kind of feed? I tried adding you to my feedreader and no luck. Email me or reply at Righ Truth. I'll be back here (I've blogrolled you)

Also very nice blog, it looks exactly like mine, ha.

[gringoman]

Debbie,

Can't find an email address for you.

[shawn]

On most winger-sites ZOG is generally short for 'Zionist occupation government.' If a name like ZOGusa isn't anti-american and nazi-esque, I don't know what is.

[gringoman]

Shawn,

methinks you might have a point (despite lack of proof.) I could even agree that reference to "gene pool" is a racist statement? What then, is the point?
(1) 'racism' is now forbidden from Western civilization's "free exchange of ideas" and the Left will tar you as a 'winger' if you do not obey the edicts from their professors or other sources?

(2) controversy is still permitted, unless it's from a Zogusa?

(3) 'Racism' of the Right is forbidden, but the devious, camouflaged racism of the Left is permitted?

Incidentally, if you're right about 'Zogusa,' it helps make my point to the so-called "anti-racist" Wedeen. Instead of the "white supremacist" which this fool automatically assumed 'Zogusa' to be, he might be an Arab, or at least an Islamic, supremacist.

[Free Anahuac]

Illegal immigration started in 1492, when the first illegals were crossing the Mexican border (Atlantic Ocean). Let's get something straight, Mexicans are Indigenous, First Nation People, so called "Native Americans".
These same Mexicans who are supposedly "crossing illegally" are STILL related to Indigenous people in the U.S.A.

Mexicans are related to the following "American" Tribes:

Comanche
Ute
Southern Paiute
Northern Paiute
Shoshone
Hopi
Apache
Yaqui
Pima
Tohono O'odham
Goshiute
All the Pueblos
San Juan
Santa Clara
San Ildefonso
Nambe
Tesuque
Pojoaque
Hano
Taos
Picuris
Sandia
Isleta
Walpi
Sichomovi
Polacca
Shimopovi
Shipaulovi
Mishongnovi
Oraibi
Kykotzomovi
Hotevilla
Bacavi
Moenkopi
Bannock
Pnamint
Lehmi
Wind River
Kwaiisu
Chemehuevi
Kickapua (Kickapoo of Oklahoma and Nacimiento, Mexico)
Sac and Fox

I CAN GO ON AND ON...WE ARE ONE PEOPLE! WE ARE RELATED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE WALL.

FREE ANAHUAC FROM AMERICAN COLONIALISM (and from the SOON to come NATIONAL SUNDAY LAW)

ANAHUAC