MCC ("Fighting for the Truth, Exposing the
corrupt") has scored again in the strange case of Air Force Colonel Phillip Shue
and his now wealthy widow, Lt. Colonel Tracy Shue (USAF, Ret.) The nouveau
millionairess, after relentless pressure from militarycorruption.com, has
finally paid back the $12,000 (for alleged legal fees) she extracted from her
late husband's elderly parents who live on a modest income. In 2003 the body of
Colonel Shue was found in a car on a Texas highway. For local police and the
Air Force the case remains closed and ruled a "suicide," despite the undeniable
signs of torture and mutilation. (Colonel Shue's Rich Widow). MCC applauds the
Widow Shue's decision, finally, "to fork over the $12,000" to the Colonel's old
parents, despite her doing it gracelessly---no note, no apology, and no
two-years' interest. In The Other "Shue" Finally Drops, MCC reveals more of the
latest in this bizarre case, including the Widow Shue's exceptional skills at
money management and capital accumulation, and the pleas by Colonel Shue's
parents for the video tape she promised them, the one of their son's memorial service at
Arlington National Cemetery.
The Mohammed Cartoon War has been cruel
to Secular Sammy and the neo-com foes of neo-cons. They are normally quick to stand up for 'freedom from
religion,' i.e. freedom from Christian theocrats,
Christian puritans, Christian anti-abortionists, Christians against Sodom and Gomorrah, Christians who don't want Suzy "marrying" Samantha etc. Their venerated
Rottweiller, the ACLU, has even had Christian crosses on the burial grounds of
World War II veterans declared illegal, citing the cemetery as being on
Government property. [Cartoon 'Meet Your New Editor' by Mike Luckovich, Atlanta Journal Constitution, hat tip www.michaelgraham.com]
But this time was a little different. No Pat
Robertson to snicker at fearlessly. No evangelicals to battle bravely. No
reading of Psalms in school to put down with legalistic valor. No Creationism
for Comedy Hour smart bombs. No Genesis-quoting politician to skin heroically
for WaPo or "Pinch" Sulzberger's paper. . No apostle of Armageddon to vanquish. Not this
time. This time the religion was, uh, Islam.
International mobs had been rabble-roused by Radio
Imam and Jihad TV over twelve cartoons published four months previously in
Denmark. Agitation? Fury? Goebbels-in-a-Djellabah had them super-stoked against
the Homosexual Crusaders, the unclean unbelievers. And now they were ready,
in beards and burqas, for service on CNN and Al-Jazeera. And how did they
react to infidels who disobeyed their mooslim strictures on depicting the
prophet/warlord Mohammed (who they claimed not to idolize)? They reacted with
faith. With devotion. With religious dedication. That is, they burned embassies
and Christian flags(especially the Danish, with white cross) shrieking "You
will pay!" and "To hell with your free speech!" and sometimes even "Have we got
a holocaust for you!"
A moment of truth for the West and its (normally)
noisy secularites? What was the reaction from the usual foes of mob rule,
angry wingnuts, sexual repression, religious racketeering and men controlling
women's bodies? Actually, not much. It bordered on zilch. Hollywood's
anti-fascist narcissists were pretty quiet---not even mentioning the Bush Nazis
they are forced to live and party under. No one suggested taking the homopromo
frenzy for 'Brokeback Mountain' to Islamic media, as an experiment in
In fact, aside from the upstart blogosphere, which
dared to show the evidence that allegedly unleashed the Mobs of Mohammed, it
was virtually all quiet on the Western front. Eliteniks from media to education
to government were either shutting up or clamping down, often both. With
stunningly few exceptions, nobody showed the prima facie evidence for
the controversy, the 12 moderately satirical cartoons published by
Jyllens-Posten in Copenhagen on September 30, 2005 (over four months
before the "spontaneous" riots.) An elementary rule of honest reportage (not to
mention law going back to ancient Rome), was suddenly verboten. CNN?
("Your world raw, unfiltered and live. You see it when we see it.") Alas, no.
Not this time, baby. Verboten. (CNN's wanting to avoid "giving offense"
came at the same time it was showing a black rapper's dopey posturing as a
crucified Christ.) The eliteniks were freaking. Even President Bush at first
seemed to side with mob indignation, then got more "balanced" as embassies
burned in terror-friendly Syria. French President Chirac, in a country once
known for Voltaire and the Enlightenment, called publication of the Mohammed
cartoons "a provocation." UN Secretary-General, the scandal-ridden Kofi Annan, a
favorite of white globalizers and the World Welfare Project, scolded any media
that dared to publish the Mohammed cartoons. At Cardiff University in Wales four
students were suspended for publishing the cartoons in the student newspaper,
and most of the 10,000 copies were confiscated. In Sweden and Switzerland the
Government shut down internet sites that published the cartoons. They did not
even need the kind of help that "Don't Do Evil" Google and Yahoo rendered
to Beijing commisars for quashing web freedom in China.
Sad? Ludicrous? Troubling? Or just ignominious, abject, pathetic and deeply revolting? 2500
years of Western civilization, culture, gods, goddesses, God, tragedy, plague,
exploration, invention from jet flight to the Internet, creation from
Shakespeare to Bach to the rule of law, discoveries from the swamps to the
stars , where even the shape of the mosque was made possible by the stupendous
Pantheon and the Roman dome ---for what? For the triumph of the wuss and the
Are Secular Sammy and friends now on full display
in the light of day, their credibility--what was left of it--- beheaded? Are
they now revealed---to everyone except themselves---as headless hypocrites,
their double standard blown away by 12 cartoons?
Keshertalk, in 'the measure of artistic risk'
takes a look and seems to think so. How to explain the secularite taste for
surrender, the willingness to compromise with barbarism and genital mutilation?
Isn't it now all too obvious? Behind the worldly veneer---fear. Nothing like
good old fear to get the multi-culterati to bend over.(The Boston Phoenix, an
alternative weekly, on Feb 09 confessed it would not publish the cartoons "Out
of fear of retaliation from the international brotherhood of radical and
bloodthirsty Islamists...."). Most everyone in Lamestream Media(Mainstream, if
you prefer) did fine-sounding mealy mouth about "not wanting to give offense"
etc ad blah-blah.) Keshertalk says that the self-styled speakers of truth to
power are "just pretending at courage. Cross
the line and say something about Islam, and your life is on the
line."(url problem at Keshertalk. If you can't find this post, see related ones.)
Whether in Brokeback Hollywood, a media suite, a rap studio, a politico's
office or even an artist's den, they know how to play it safe. They know how to
keep the odds against being kidnapped, assassinated, having family
threatened or having to do a Salman Rushdie and go into hiding from a fatwa.
They can be as outspoken and Michael Moore and anti-American as they like.
They can lampoon heterosexual Boy Scouts and the Family Coalition. Baptists
are fair game (if they're white.) Zionists are fair game. Neo-cons are fair
game. Exxon and McDonald's are fair game.
Or does this
mis-characterize and mis-represent? Is it really just about
principles, convictions, ethics, and not a bankrupt double standard? Maybe it
really has nothing to do with the wuss (naive and cowardly) or the weasel
(devious and cowardly)?
Maybe the real
reason they don't mess with the mullah and the imam is...is...is...?
[Of special interest on how the Wuss and the Weasel relate to the West and Islam today, see the always exceptional Alexandra's The Sin of Racism at All Things Beautiful, and The Roses of the Prophet at The American Princess (a very good Catholic girl, and see Michelle Malkin's "Gevoelig",[Feb 16]a Dutch cartoon video, and Joe Katzman at Winds of Change takes a look at 'tired European statism' in 'Cartoon Revelations'. And just when you thought the Islamites might start to chill out a bit, Shakespeare' Sister reports a $1 million bounty for killing Danish cartoonist)
A first in the annals of journalism? A
bulldog (award-winning) reporter is openly addressing a widow in the matter of
her husband's death, in a case that is technically closed. It's Air Force,
it's Texas and it's happening at MCC (MilitaryCorruption.com)"fighting for the
truth, exposing the corrupt.") MCC is the website that's proudly American and
willing to take on military brass. In other words, it has enemies both in the
Pentagon and among the anti-American leftniki. MCC is not accusing Air
Force Lt. Colonel Tracy Shue (recently retired and recently a millionairess.)
However, it's doing what no one else is: raising very troubling questions about
the death of Air Force Colonel Phillip Shue. The Colonel's body, incidentally,
was found with nipples and finger tip surgically removed, cult-style. Local law
enforcement pronounced this a "suicide," and the United States Air Force
accepts this ruling. MCC is now addressing the Widow Shue directly. Sparks are
flying in this 'Newly New Journalism." Maybe you think MCC is "picking on" a
poor widow just because she's now a poor rich widow? Advisory: There's more to
this story of Stateside Air Force life today. Details now from MCC at "Give Back The
Money!" Also, see follow-up post, Colonel's Widow Forks Over.
While most Mainstream (if not Lamestream) Media
continue to practice a form of disinformation, i,e, the liberals, NY Times, BBC, UN functionaries, Slick Willie and even Pat
Buchanan-like "conservatives" pontificate and moralize about the "offensive"
Mohammed drawings without publishing the evidence, an honest web journalist like
Paul Belien makes the case for death, under Sharia law, for the pig-hustling
Danish imams. (Yes, pig-hustling. See below.)
At The Brussels Journal ("We are all Danes now") Belien reveals
how these imams, feeding on Euro socialism's generous welfare goodies, living high off the halal, show their gratitude to the acquiescing infidels. In this case they
traveled to the Middle East on Project Cartoon Holy War, a mission designed to incite the mobs for CNN/Al-Jazeera duty etc.(gringoNote: whether this shows coordination with Iran mullahs who want to nuke up, avoid UN sanctions and denounce the West, you decide. Maybe it's only a coincidence that the "offensive" Denmark is due to assume the rotating presidency of the UN Security Council.) The traveling imams had work to do. Apparently not confident that the 12
cartoons published by Jyllends-Posten in Copenhagen were inflammatory enough,
they added something that was never published in Denmark: a depiction of
Mohammed with a pig snout. (The blogosphere---Dennis Nixon---has tracked down this image to a
French country fair that had nothing to do with Islam. See Nixon's pictures at NeanderNews and The Brussels Journal). Paul Belien's point: This
pig chicanery, using a manipulated image, shows how mooslims have committed the grossest insult possible to Mohammed:
likening him to swine. Punishment? Well, Denmark, as an EU member, does not have the death
penalty. Besides, the West doesn't do religious executions anymore. It's a mooslim matter anyway. Sharia, anyone, for pig-hustling imams? (See at All Things Beautiful, Alexandra's "The Metastasizing Shari'a. Meanwhile, The American Princess indicates that Europe (i.e. the eliteniks' EU, may be ready to appease the mooslims,We Are Prepared to Protect You. TigerHawk seems to agree. Michelle Malkin has a whole lot on The Pig Snout Swindle. For insight on how the blogosphere has shamed and out-informed MSM on this story, check out UK-Media Recognition For Blogs at USS Neverdock.)
Is anything more needed to demonstrate (1) how lame is the "we won't publish" Mainstream and (2) how devious the "sensitive" imams and mullahcracy can be? Well, how about another startling discovery on the 12 Mohammed cartoons the Danes published September 30, 2005? These cartoons were also published in Egypt! With no brouhaha, no riots, no death threats, no desecration of the Egyptian flag, no rabble screaming "You will pay!" Muslim Egypt published drawings satirizing Mohammed! Didn't CNN/Al-Jazeera know? And how do we know?... It's thanks (yet again) to the blogosphere. That's how. As follows...
Freedom For Egyptians
reminded me why the cartoons looked so familiar to me: they were
actually printed in the Egyptian Newspaper Al Fagr back in October
2005. I repeat, October 2005, during Ramadan, for all the egyptian
muslim population to see, and not a single squeak of outrage was
present. Al Fagr isn't a small newspaper either: it has respectable
circulation in Egypt, since it's helmed by known Journalist Adel
Hamoudah. Looking around in my house I found the copy of the newspaper,
so I decided to scan it and present to all of you to see.
Can't believe it? All right. Have a look. Rantings of a Sandmonkey (Feb 08, 2005)has Al Fagr's Mohammedan cartoons ready for the viewing....(Incidentally, the UN's Kofi Annan (investigated for mega scandals and corruption) now wags a finger at Western media, warning against publishing these cartoons he calls "insensitive" and "offensive" and "provocative." We have no report of the Kofi reaction to Al Fagr's publication in Egypt of the very same "provocations.")
As for our own Mainstream Media, they are not
subject to Sharia law (as of 2006), especially as their "sensitivity" to
Mohammed drawings doesn't compute with their other coverage, such as "bad boy
artist" Andres Serrano's "Piss Christ," depicting a crucifix submerged in a
glass of the "artist's" urine, not to mention the 1996 painting of a black
Madonna with a clump of elephant dung on her breast (foto appearing in "Pinch"
Sulzberger's New York Times as recently as yesterday.) We also have no record of the Oil-For-Food UN calling these "insensitive" or "offensive" or "provocative."
And no one has suggested that
these "sophisticates" are digging a bowge in Dante's Inferno.
Suddenly, incredibly, swooping down from European
skies, a specter is haunting and agitating all Islam: the specter of Western Civilization and free speech. Western men (well, a few,
anyway) have defied not only white progressives and their multy-culty
political correctness, but, far more seriously, the mooslim code. That is, they dared
to rejoin Western civilization, exercising free speech on a religious figure.
White progs do this too, of course, but with Christianity. This time there's a
kicker. The target is not Jesus or the Virgin Mary or 'Merry Christmas' or Jerry Falwell, This time it's the warlord/ prophet
Mohammed (said not to be an idol.) Some Western men are indeed living
dangerously. Mooslims are boiling over with the insult to Mohammed (said not to
be an idol.) Mooslims, as you know, venerate, and would not worship an
Maybe it's all little Denmark's fault? On September
30, 2005, its biggest newspaper did what liberals, lefties, most Republicans,
Condoleeza Rice, George Bush and "Pinch" Sulzberger's New York Times would not
dream of doing: Jyllands-Posten published 12 cartoons satirizing Mohammed (said
not to be an idol.)
This is strictly a no-no for mooslims (as novelist
Salman Rushdie could have explained when he went into hiding for two years after
getting fatwa-ed for writing the "Satanic Verses.")
Why did Jyllands-Posten misbehave, or act like it
did not fear what President Bush calls "The Religion of Peace"? Actually, it
really was about fear and free speech, and which do you choose. Author Kare
Bluitgen couldn't find anyone to illustrate his book on Mohammed the warlord
prophet. Danish illustrators feared death threats from mooslims. What? In
todays' gentle Scandinavia, this doled-out generous welfare make-pitta-not-war
Europe, hailed as so superior to Cowboy America?.... Yes...Yes....The
Multy-Culty has landed. They knew that Theo van
Gogh(great-great grandson of Vincent ), after making a film on mooslim violence
against women, was stabbed and shot dead in Amsterdam in November, 2004. They
knew that Dutch Professor Pim Fortuyn, who criticized immigration and called
Islam "a backward culture" was assassinated in May, 2002 by a left-wing
environmentalist.They understand that progressives and their media, the white
eliteniks with their law or business degrees or TV or movie contracts or trust
funds, don't much care, unless you can implicate Israel, Bush or the Christian
Jyllands-Posten took a stand in Copenhagen. This
was not U.S. media cake walk, or just a nasty war of words, where "dissidents"
can slam opponents, and even strut and say "Hitler" and maybe, very
occasionally, face a subpoena. This was real life. The Danes have a national
memory of Nazis in their homeland. Now they would test what was stronger in
Europe today: free speech or the mooslims. They published the 12 cartoons,
including the one where Mohammed at the entrance to paradise is trying to hold
back the martyrs with, "Stop, stop! We have run out of virgins!"( Defying the Ummah, the community of believers? It was
irreverent. Post-medeival. Un-pc. But was it the safe thing to do?
It was thought the story would die after initial
protests, warnings, death threats, the ritual dispatch of pc functionaries, UN
"experts on racism" to investigate "disrespect for belief." But, surprising
many, the story did not die. Somehow, news cycle after news cycle, it kept
breathing . Jyllands-Posten issued an apology, of sorts, saying it did not mean
to offend, but it would defend its freedom of the press---another of those
infidel concepts. Even the Prime Minister Rasmussen chimed in. Rasmussen made
clear that he, too, defended that freedom. These Danes were not crumbling like
the butter cookies, or a sensitive white wuss.They were not even shifting blame
to the usual suspects, like the Zionists, the neo-cons or Haliburton. What could
this be---men who took their Western heritage seriously? Weren't they tuned in
to The Best and The Brightest Progs, like His Slickness Bill Clinton who, while
the Middle East was showing rabbis as cannibals and televising the Protocols of
the Elders of Zion, called these 12 Mohammed cartoons "appalling" and compared
them to anti-semitism?
Some, worried that being called "Islamophobe"
might tarnish you even more than "homophobe," point to the Washington post
cartoon about Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and an Iraq veteran without arms or
legs. Didn't the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in a rare move, write to WaPo about the
insensitivity? This is true. But the Chiefs, while dismayed by the use of a
paraplegic for a political agenda, agreed with the papers' right to freedom of
expression and apparently made no bomb threats.
Does this "revolt" in Copenhagen really represent
the West? The "sensitized" West of 2006? And who will cave?
We may find out sooner than expected. Mooslims
around the world, incited by their expert inciters, are now properly on fire.
(In pc era, you musn't call it rabble-rousing.) Often sharp poker players in the
past, playing their Israel card, they are now showing a different hand against
the unclean gentiles. Boycotts. Issuing of threats, Diplomatic sanctions.
Embassies closed. Shrieks for revenge and retribution. Even the progressive
old nanny BBC is reporting global mayhem. Danish-Swedish dairy giant Arla Foods
has been shut down in Saudi Arabia, its sales sinking to zero in MIddle East.
Danes and other kaffirs in danger of being kidnapped or worse. Thousands of
Palestinians in the streets, on break from shouting "Death to Israel." Gunmen
of the martyr's brigades raid the EU offices in Gaza.
Kalashnikovs are brandished at the heathen (and frightened?) West. Mooslim macho
roars again, as the comfortable white eliteniks search for a way to calm the
onslaught and surrender in style.
Will the West cave? That is, will the lawyers and
diplomats and UN functionaries and progressives find a way to surrender a
legacy of centuries and call it "a mature solution to cultural differences"?
Appeasement served with haute cuisine? Who doesn't want peace, no matter how
temporary and deceptive?
Actually, there are still a few signs that old
Europe might not be too moribund yet. Can it still resist the growing might of
the mullahs? The Danish Prime MInister Rasmussen, while praising
Jylland-Posten's "apology" to mooslims, re-iterated his stand for free speech.
Other papers are supporting little Denmark, re-printing the cartoons in
soldarity: La Stampa in Italy, El Periodico in Spain, Volkskrant in Holland, Die
Welt in Germany.
But let's get real. In Europe the oil money talks.
Saudi wahhabi understands it well. In Paris at France-Soir the editor who
published the Mohammed cartoons in solidarity with the Danes has been
sacked---by his Egyptian boss. Forget 'The mooslims are coming.' The
mooslims are there already, and you know it. So why not desist, along with the
progs and eliteniks and leave the battle to baby, in times to come? At any rate
wasn't old Europe, medicated into a comfortable socialized stupor, supposed to
go quietly in its sunset of demographic doom, churches empty, mosques full, as
the multiplying mooslims show their gratitude for Euro-Lefty's welfare bonanza
by allowing the greyed-out race to witness the exotic spectacle of Sharia comes
to Eurabia---a continent free of American cowboys, evangelicals and where even
Coca Cola is replaced by Mecca Cola?
A clash? A conflict? An international crisis over
Wills are going to be tested, while the Bush White House sides with mooslim over free speech: old Europe's will
and the mooslim will. Blasphemy against the warlord-prophet Mohammed (said not to be an idol) vs.
Blasphemy against Western civilization.
The will of the West vs. the will of the mooslims. Which will prevail?
U.S. Army retired Brigadier General Bernardo
Negrete is the latest in a string of mysterious, high-ranking deaths in Texas,
as reported by www.militarycorruption.com. Four
months after the highly respected General's official "suicide" when his wealthy
wife Victoria (he was her husband #4) said he shot himself (her daughter heard two or three shots), the San Antonio police have not
yet released to taxpayers who fund them the results of their investigation. Two handguns were found at the death site, each with a spent cartridge. No results of gunpowder residue or autopsy have been released.
Negrete's first wife and son are still waiting for answers. Other troubling
cases are associated with Lackland Air Force Base. MCC, hard-hitting, relentless
and probing as ever (and associated with gringoVision) is tracking down a surprising, even amazing, link between
the Negrete "suicide" and another big MCC on-going investigation, the "suicide"
of Air Force Colonel Phillip Shue, his body found with parts surgically removed, cult style.
Shue was formerly married to Lt. Colonel Tracy Shue, (now, incidentally, a
millionairess) ....The War on Error continues.